Responding to international concerns surrounding the situation for press freedom in the United Kingdom, the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA) has concluded a series of high-profile meetings with prominent individuals and leading organisations representing multiple interests during a two-day fact-finding visit to London, held over 15-16 January.
"Our visit has been unanimously welcomed as a timely and much needed initiative at a moment of great uncertainty for the future of the British press," said WAN-IFRA CEO, Vincent Peyrègne.
"Our mission confirmed differences of opinion in terms of how the introduction of legislation governing the press will impact press freedom. It highlighted serious concerns regarding the independence from political involvement in that process, and how implementation of the legislation that underpins the Royal Charter could potentially be abused to restrict a free press both here in the UK and abroad."
Of particular concern to the mission was the British government's reaction to the Guardian newspaper's reporting of National Security Agency leaks provided by Edward Snowden. The delegation expressed its solidarity with the position of Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger after his appearance before members of parliament in December 2013 to answer to claims the newspaper's reporting methods threatened British national security. Mission delegates reiterated their support for the Guardian's publication of an issue that is clearly of great public interest – not just for the UK but worldwide.
The mission highlighted WAN-IFRA's concern that general confusion surrounding changes to the self-regulation system for the press in the United Kingdom, coupled with the government's chilling intimidation of the Guardian, is sending a negative message to the international community. That foreign governments may cite the current British example when reforming their own regulatory processes, as well as the inspiration they may take in how to treat investigative journalism, remain of particular concern and risks causing serious repercussions worldwide.
During its two day fact-finding visit, the delegation met with the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Maria Miller MP; John Whittingdale MP, Chairman of the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee; leading human rights lawyer Lord Lester; Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger; the Independent newspaper group; the Telegraph Group; Associated Newspapers; the Newspaper Society; the Newspaper Publishers Association; the Society of Editors; the Commonwealth Press Union Media Trust; the Press Complaints Commission; Ipso; Article 19; Index On Censorship; English PEN; the Hacked Off group; and leading academics and media commentators.
A report detailing the mission's findings, providing a mapping of the various positions and an outline of the major differences and concerns will be published in February.
Previous press freedom missions have been to countries such as Ethiopia, South Africa, Libya, Yemen, Tunisia, Mexico, Honduras, Ecuador, Colombia, Guatemala, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Myanmar, but this is the first ever mission to the United Kingdom.
The WAN-IFRA delegation included:
Erik Bjereger - Editor-in-Chief and Managing Director, Kristeligt Dagblad, Denmark / President, World Editors Forum; Vincent Peyrègne - CEO, WAN-IFRA; Zaffar Abbas - Editor-in-Chief, Dawn, Pakistan; Roger Parkinson - Former President and Publisher of the StarTribune/Former Publisher, CEO, and Chairman of the Toronto Globe and Mail / Past President, WAN-IFRA; Italy; Randi Øgrey - CEO, Mediebedriftenes Landsforening, Norway; Kjersti Løken Stavrum - General Secretary, Norwegian Press Council; Matti Kalliokoski - Senior editorial writer, Helsingen Sanomat, Finland; Jonathan Cooper - VP, Digital First Media, USA; Ebbe Dal, Chair of the European Newspaper Publishers Association Committee of Directors.
The delegation also included observers from the Inter-American Press Association (IAPA), the International Association of Broadcasting (IAB), the International Press Institute (IPI), the World Press Freedom Committee (WPFC), and the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).
